🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."