🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His top-class serve and concussive power on each forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

The American has made a several significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When he eventually did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to win it. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never especially seem like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually highly unlikely for all other players. {